How well a community reacts when faced with a disaster is largely dependent on knowledge and training. The people elected or selected into positions which will have to deal with such crises must have the unique skill set designed for such events. One of the most critical capabilities necessary is accurate verbal interaction, which requires emergency communication equipment.
Social animals, from lions to elephants, rely on a leader to help everyone survive in a crisis. In Severe drought, the matriarch elephant leads the group as far as it takes to get water. Similarly, when roaming lions attempt to take over a pride, the pride depends on the dominant lion to fend off the attack off, and human societies have an analogous response.
Leaders of every community have a responsibility, legal and moral, to prepare for the unknown, to help each group be as ready as possible to survive and recover. Whether a crisis is a natural phenomenon like an earthquake or wildfire, or of human sourcing as in war, preparation is an inherent responsibility of leadership. As human settlements became more complex, it meant that there is much more to prepare for and protect.
Throughout the nation, each community has developed a way to deal with disasters. While information and experience sharing have always been a part of the process of developing contingency response systems, there was no standard way of getting things done. Some organizations, both public and private, also have set methods for dealing with contingencies.
For the most part, the responsibilities and tasks are assigned to people who do something entirely different as a job. When an emergency occurs, the ease of response and recovery depends in large part to the skills of those individuals assigned to act. How well these individuals can actually respond is a matter of training, exercises and experience.
A number of private companies and some governmental agencies have developed their own courses of instruction. Each military organization, for example, holds a required number of exercises each year designed to test the leadership and resources of the organization in the aftermath of a number of different contingencies. The process was different for each service, just as it was for each city or private organization.
When a contingency occurs that is small enough the an individual group can handle it alone, their systems and experience serve them well and the responses are often accomplished efficiently and well. But the nature of contingencies is that they are often too large for an individual organization to contain. Sometimes the event simply involves more than one organization at a time.
Following such major catastrophes as the Oklahoma bombing and Hurricane Katrina the after action analysis led to the development of a nation-wide formal process called National Incident Management System. With all military and government entities required to participate and private organizations encouraged to, standardization has come a long way. The key to being able to work together for mutual assistance was standardizing and training on emergency communication equipment.
Social animals, from lions to elephants, rely on a leader to help everyone survive in a crisis. In Severe drought, the matriarch elephant leads the group as far as it takes to get water. Similarly, when roaming lions attempt to take over a pride, the pride depends on the dominant lion to fend off the attack off, and human societies have an analogous response.
Leaders of every community have a responsibility, legal and moral, to prepare for the unknown, to help each group be as ready as possible to survive and recover. Whether a crisis is a natural phenomenon like an earthquake or wildfire, or of human sourcing as in war, preparation is an inherent responsibility of leadership. As human settlements became more complex, it meant that there is much more to prepare for and protect.
Throughout the nation, each community has developed a way to deal with disasters. While information and experience sharing have always been a part of the process of developing contingency response systems, there was no standard way of getting things done. Some organizations, both public and private, also have set methods for dealing with contingencies.
For the most part, the responsibilities and tasks are assigned to people who do something entirely different as a job. When an emergency occurs, the ease of response and recovery depends in large part to the skills of those individuals assigned to act. How well these individuals can actually respond is a matter of training, exercises and experience.
A number of private companies and some governmental agencies have developed their own courses of instruction. Each military organization, for example, holds a required number of exercises each year designed to test the leadership and resources of the organization in the aftermath of a number of different contingencies. The process was different for each service, just as it was for each city or private organization.
When a contingency occurs that is small enough the an individual group can handle it alone, their systems and experience serve them well and the responses are often accomplished efficiently and well. But the nature of contingencies is that they are often too large for an individual organization to contain. Sometimes the event simply involves more than one organization at a time.
Following such major catastrophes as the Oklahoma bombing and Hurricane Katrina the after action analysis led to the development of a nation-wide formal process called National Incident Management System. With all military and government entities required to participate and private organizations encouraged to, standardization has come a long way. The key to being able to work together for mutual assistance was standardizing and training on emergency communication equipment.
About the Author:
When your organization needs the finest emergency communication equipment click the link to www.kccom.com. For more info on K&C Communications, visit us online today at http://www.kccom.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment